Willmon v. Peck
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants in an action for the specific performance of a contract to purchase real estate.
At the time of the transaction, George H. Peek was the owner of the east half of the only block numbered 61 located in the city of San Pedro, which east half of said block comprised lots 7 to 12, both inclusive. Neither defendant had or claimed any interest in the west half of said block, which comprised lots 1 to 6, both inclusive. It appears from parol testimony that sometime prior to February 3, 1903, the date of the alleged purchase, a real…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ontario Deciduous Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. Cutting Fruit Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Ferguson v. Blackwell Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1890
- Hoult v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stevens v. MostachettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Corona Unified School District v. VejarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Palm Springs-La Quinta Development Co. v. Palm Springs Land & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Security Investment Co. v. BartramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921