Hoult v. Baldwin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joacpiin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the decision rendered upon the former appeal in the same case, reported in 67 Cal. 610.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Action to recover the price of a combined header and separator. This is the second appeal to this court. The facts will be found stated in Hoult v. Baldwin, 67 Cal. 610. In its former decision reversing the case, this court said that the principal questions for the jury were: 1. Would the machine, as sent forward, do good work in cutting and thrashing ordinary grain from one to five feet in height? 2. Was it reasonably fit for the purpose for which it was ordered? 3. Was there any latent defect arising from the process of manufacture not disclosed to the buyer ?
Upon the second trial, these…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hoult v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. WynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stevens v. MostachettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Willmon v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- American Soda Fountain Co. v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929