Legal Opinion

People v. Kuder

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1928No. Docket No. 1539PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The respondents were tried before a jury in San Bernardino County upon a charge of having violated the Corporate Securities Act, and were convicted. They then moved the trial court for an arrest of judgment, which motion was granted upon the ground that the indictment failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. The People appealed from such ruling, and respondents moved this court for an order dismissing said appeal, which we denied on April 3, 1928 (90 Cal. App. 594 [266 Pac. 337]). The case is now before us upon its merits.

In the indictment which is the subject of this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Board of Harbor Commissioners v. Excelsior Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. LeyshonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Matter of Application of DartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tango v. TulevechNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Gospel Army v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. BeeslyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. ClemettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API