Legal Opinion
Dooley v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1933No. Docket No. 9036PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
These two cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The plaintiffs each joined the United States navy early in 1919 and continued to serve in the said navy until 1923 when they were honorably discharged from said service. Each of them in the time required by law made application to the defendant, who was then the duly qualified and acting county assessor of the county of San Diego, California, for a veteran’s tax exemption for the year 1932 as provided for by section l1/^ of article XIII of the Constitution of this state. The said assessor having denied to each of said…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- R. Ribas Y Hijo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- People v. Monterey Fish Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- City of West Fargo v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937