Legal Opinion

Domestic Block Coal Co. v. Holden

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1913No. 8,070PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Putnam Circuit Court; James A. McNutt, Special Judge. Action by David Holden against the Domestic Block Coal Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, J.

Appellee brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained while working for appellant as a miner in one of its mines. The amended complaint is in two paragraphs. The first alleges negligence of appellant under §12 of the mining act of 1905. Acts 1905 p. 65, §8580 Burns 1914. The second proceeds upon the theory of a violation of certain common law duties which appellant owed to appellee as its servant. Separate demurrers to each paragraph of the amended complaint were overruled, and this action of the court is assigned as error. Answers in general denial were filed to each…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Davis Coal Co. v. PollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Davis v. Achor, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. TrzopIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. American Maize Products Co. v. WidigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kurtz v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BirIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API