Legal Opinion

Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1861PublishedCited by 61 opinions

APPEAL from the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The Cincinnati and Fort Wayne Railroad Co. sued David Heaston, on an alleged subscription to the capital stock of said company, of $1,500. His subscription appears to the original articles of organization, and a copy of them is filed as the foundation of the action. The defendant answered in sixteen paragraphs. To a part of those paragraphs the plaintiff demurred; the Court sustained the demurrer, the defendant excepted, and the cause was continued. At a subsequent term, the Court permitted those demurrers to be withdrawn, and .others to be filed, argued and decided upon. The appellant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jones v. Cincinnati Type Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Carpenter v. DameIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Harris v. Muskingum Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1837
  4. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Atlantic & Ohio Railroad v. SullivantOhio Supreme Court · 1855

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. City of Goshen v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API