Legal Opinion

West v. Village of Morrisville

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided April 28, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-8PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFRIN, Chief Judge.

This action is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have alleged violation of their rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution caused by defendants’ practice of seeking payment from property owners for delinquent electric charges incurred by tenants. 1 In addition to their constitutional claims, plaintiffs have asserted other defenses to payment which we consider to be in the nature of pendent claims. The parties have entered into an extensive stipulation of facts so we need not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. West v. Village of MorrisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Vermont Fiberglass, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1984
  5. Brown v. City of BarreDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API