Legal Opinion
Ransom v. Marrazzo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 25, 1988No. 87-1715PublishedCited by 243 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Chief Judge:
Appellants Jeryline Ransom, James Willis, Cynthia Muse, Alicia Powell and Rose Tull appeal from the dismissal of their amended complaint, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against the City of Philadelphia on behalf of the class of Philadelphia residents to whom water and sewer service was denied unless they paid the delinquent service charges incurred, but not paid, by the prior customers of water services at their residences. The district court refused the plaintiffs’ prayer for a declaration that the policy and practice of requiring water and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. KraftsowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Young v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.