Legal Opinion

International Forwarding Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 16, 1929No. 3109PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Merchandise consisting of parts of sewing machines was assessed for duty by the collector at 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as-follows:

Par. 372. * * * sewing machines, and parts- thereof, not specially provided for, valued at not more than $75 each, 15 per centum ad valorem; valued at more than $75 each, 30 per centum ad valorem; * * *.

It is claimed by appellant that the merchandise is dutiable at only 15 per centum ad valorem under the first part of the quoted •provisions of paragraph 372.

The cause was submitted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Maltus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Quong Yuen Shing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. Textile Design Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  5. United States v. Sheep Shearers Mdse. & Comm. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API