Winters v. FIDDIE

On appeal from the trial court, Dana and Daniella Winters (individually “Mr. Winters/Mrs. Winters,” collectively “Buyers”) contend the trial court erred on several grounds when it granted Joyce Fiddie, C.W. Burbage, (collectively “Sellers”) and Barbara Daniels’ (“Daniels”) motion for a new trial absolute. On cross-appeal, Sellers and Daniels claim the trial *635court committed reversible error when it (1) applied the Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act1 (“the Act”) to a non-residential transaction; (2) failed to grant Sellers’ motion for a directed verdict; and (3) allowed Buyers to…