Legal Opinion

Mattel, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 8, 1968No. C.D. 3531; Protest 66/69722-82335PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALETZ, Judge:

This case involves the proper classification of wigs for dolls. The wigs were classified by the collector under item 737.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as parts of dolls, and assessed with duty at 35 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly classifiable under the eo nomine provision for “wigs” in item 790.70, with duty at 14 percent ad valorem.

At the trial, the government abandoned and repudiated the collector’s classification and thus relinquished its presumption of correctness in this case. See e. g., Smith & Nichols (Inc), v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wico Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Haan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. Oxford International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API