Oxford International Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of bicycle mirrors imported from Japan in 1966. Each bicycle mirror consists of a glass reflecting surface, known as the “mirror head,” and a rod and clamps, that constitute the “mounting bracket.”
The defendant, in its brief, describes the imported bicycle mirrors as follows:
“The importation herein (as represented by Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1) consists of an encased glass reflecting surface, 8" in diameter, an 8" long rod and two clamps. The rod and clamps (mounting bracket) are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Oxford International Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Westminster Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Parts Manufacturing Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- B & E Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Ornametals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974