Legal Opinion

Buckeye Incubator Co. v. Hillpot

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 4, 1927No. 2026PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BODINE, District Judge.

This suit is an action in equity for the infringement of claims 1 and 2 of the Smith incubator patent, No. 1,262,860. The defendant operated at Frenehtown, N. J., and Easton, Pa. The patent was held valid and infringed in Buckeye v. Wolf (D. C.) 291 F. 253, and in Buckeye v. Cooley, in this district, affirmed Circuit Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) 17 F.(2d) 453, and valid, but not infringed, in Buckeye v. Petersime, Southern District of Ohio, affirmed Circuit Court of Appeals (Sixth Circuit) 19 F.(2d) 721, and in Buckeye v. Blum, Northern District of Ohio, 17 F.(2d)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bartos v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
  3. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. BlumDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1927
  4. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  5. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. PetersimeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller Hatcheries, Inc. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. HillpotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  3. Robbins v. Ira M. Petersime & SonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Waxham v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Walter v. Leprino Foods CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API