Legal Opinion
Buckeye Incubator Co. v. Petersime
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1927No. 4797PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The decree below dismissed a bill for infringement of United States letters patent 1,262,860, to Samuel B. Smith, covering a hatching method for eggs and an apparatus for practicing it. The validity of the patent has been sustained in Buckeye Incubator Co. v. Wolf (D. C.) 291 F. 253, affirmed (6 C. C. A.) 296 F. 680, and in Buckeye Incubator Co. v. Cooley (3 C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 453. The process and device used by Smith are fully described in the opinion in the Wolfe Case. There is no new art in this case which, upon a reconsideration of validity, would control the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
- Wolf v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cugley v. Bundy Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Miller Hatcheries, Inc. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. HillpotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. HillpotDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.