Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Ira M. Petersime & Son
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1931No. 333PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
The appellees instituted this suit on November 22, 1928, and their bill alleges that they are the owners of patent 1,562,787, issued November 24, 1925, to Ira M. Peter-sime. The patent application, filed May 22, 1923, was for “Improvements in an Incubator,” and it is alleged that Robbins was and had been making, using and selling incubators that embodied the invention set forth in said letters patent. The usual relief grant-able in such eases was asked.
The answer denies infringement, pleads prior state of the art, and prior patents, *175among them S. B. Smith No. 1,262,860,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Ball Co. v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Ruth v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Ira M. Petersime & Son v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Mason Corp. v. HalliburtonDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1939