Legal Opinion
Waxham v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1934No. 7154PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought by Samuel B. Smith, patentee, and the Buckeye Incubator Company, a licensee, under patent No. 1,262,869, issued April 16, 1918, for an incubator, against Herbert H. Waxham, for the infringement of said patent by the use of an incubator known as Robbins No. 23 incubator purporting to be manufactured under and pursuant to patent No. 1,728,989, issued September 24, 1929', to J. L. Robbins. The matter was referred to a special master, who reported that the Smith patent was valid and was infringed. This decision was affirmed by the District Court, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. BlumDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1927
- Wolf v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Buckeye Incubator Co. v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Research Products Co. v. Tretolite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Anraku v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Fernandez v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Smith v. ThurrellDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1936