Legal Opinion

Buckeye Incubator Co. v. Cooley

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 8, 1927No. 3510PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Elden E. Cooley, the defendant below, was charged in the biü, and adjudged by the deeree from which he has appealed, to have infringed all the eláims of letters patent No. 1,262,860 and No. 1,263,138, issued on April 16, 1918, to the Buckeye Incubator Company, one of the plaintiffs, ás assignee of the inventor, S. B. Smith, the other plaintiff, for an incubator and an incubator appliance. The validity of the claims of both patents was sustained and infringement found by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Wolf v. Buckeye Incubator Co., 296 F. 680, on a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  2. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
  3. Wolf v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  4. Globe Knitting Works v. SegalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  5. Empire Rubber & Tire Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. BlumDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1927
  2. Miller Hatcheries, Inc. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. PetersimeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  4. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. HillpotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  5. Buckeye Incubator Co. v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API