Legal Opinion
Cartrette v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided January 14, 2016No. 5:14-CV-143-FLPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (DE 17). The issues raised have been briefed fully, and in this posture are ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff Judith Cartrette commenced this action against defendant Time Warner Cable, Inc. on March 10, 2014. (DE 1). In *450the complaint, plaintiff alleged defendant violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. PDR Network, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Ammons v. Ally Fin., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Mey v. Venture Data, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2017
- Barnett v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Beard v. John Hiester Chevrolet, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.