Legal Opinion
Citrano v. Berkshire Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 29, 1976PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant, Berkshire Mutual Insurance Company, rendered following a trial to the court of an action for damages claimed to be due under the provisions of an automobile insurance policy. The judgment denied damages to the named plaintiff, Christine Citrano, for personal injuries, and to her father, Engene C. Citrano, for expenses incurred in providing medical treatment for her. The parties stipulated to the essential facts and were at issue on whether the insurance policy in question, because of statutory mandate, provided coverage to the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marcolini v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Cicala v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Berlinski v. OvelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. DarrowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- O'Connor v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
3Cited by17 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Roy v. Centennial InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Earl G. Smith, Administrator of the Estate of Gary Dean Smith, Deceased v. Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.