Coleman v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, Acting P. J.
— Petitioners were charged in a single complaint with having committed various felonies. They were arraigned before a magistrate, entered pleas of not guilty, and were held to answer in respondent court after preliminary examinations conducted on the complaint. An information charging them with the felonies was filed accordingly. They moved respondent court for an order setting it aside, pursuant to Penal Code section 995, on the grounds (1) that each petitioner had been denied his right to a timely preliminary examination as provided in section 859b; 1 and (2)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. SequeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. CrowderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.