Legal Opinion
Redmond v. City of Burbank
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1941No. Civ. 12856PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Plaintiff prosecutes this action for damages on account of personal injuries suffered from a fall while walking along and upon a sidewalk in the city of Burbank.
About 9 p. m., April 28, 1936, while proceeding normally along the south side of 10th Street in Burbank, she crossed the ten-foot alley which intersected the sidewalk. In proceeding upon her course and as she was about to step from the alley at a point where the sidewalk should have continued, she fell upon a stone wall approximately fifteen inches in height, placed directly across her path and on land dedicated for sidewalk uses. It…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Luman v. Golden Ancient Channel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Herbert's Laurel-Ventura Inc. v. Laurel Ventura Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Lorraine v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Donlon v. DonlonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Rodriguez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Temple v. Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.