Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County and from an order denying a new trial. J. E. Prewitt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte,j.
—This is an action for damages by the parents, based upon the death of a son, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. The facts of the case are of the most meager character. Upon a dark and foggy morning, about half-past five o’clock, the mutilated dead body of this young man, a total stranger in the village, was found lying upon a side-track in the railroad yards of defendant at Rocklin. His body was discovered near the dead body of another man, also a stranger in the village. There were no witnesses to any accident. It is claimed by plaintiffs that deceased was killed by…
2Cited by84 opinions
- California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Petersen v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.