Legal Opinion

Donlon v. Donlon

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1956No. Civ. No. 21391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The sole question for decision herein is whether the award to respondent of five parcels of realty as her separate property although they stood in joint tenancy is supported by substantial evidence.

Respondent and appellant James were married at Los Angeles August 18, 1948, and thereafter resided in California. Having separated on December 15, 1954, respondent commenced an action for divorce eight days later, to which appellant duly filed his answer and cross-complaint. Following a trial, an interlocutory decree of divorce was filed March 14, 1955, and the motion for a new trial was denied May…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Schindler v. SchindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. DeBoer v. DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abbey v. LordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Bullock's, Inc. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Donlon v. DonlonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Donlan v. DonlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API