Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Wilhelm

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Menard County ; Clarence Martin, Judge. Action by Charles Wolf against Frank Wilhelm and others, in which part of defendants filed a cross-answer. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

This suit was filed in the district court of Menard county on April 17, 1906, by Chas. Wolf against Frank Wilhelm in trespass to try title to recover survey No. 164 containing ■— acres in Me-nard county, patented to Ludwig J. Sahm. Wilhelm answered “Not guilty” and pleaded the three, five, and ten years’ statute of limitations and vouched his landlord in. Defendants Albert Sahm et al. as heirs of Ludwig J. Sahm, adopted Wilhelm’s answer as theirs, and by cross-answer prayed for affirmative relief, claiming the title to the land. After hearing the evidence, the court directed the jury to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCampbell v. DurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Byers Bros. v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wolf v. SahmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Merrill v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. George M. Dilley & Son v. RatcliffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lotspeich v. Chance Vought AircraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Loomis v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Coffee v. William Marsh Rice UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Fenley v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. McCraw v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API