Legal Opinion

Lotspeich v. Chance Vought Aircraft

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1963No. 16172PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

Appellant Claudia Lotspeich (and husband) sued Chance Vought Aircraft, herein called the Company, and its regularly employed physician, Dr. John D. Horgan, for damages on account of appellees’ failure to tell her that she had active tuberculosis, a condition alleged to have been disclosed by X-rays of her chest taken by appellees as part of her pre-employment physical examination. The trial court sustained appel-lees’ motion for summary judgment, and our careful consideration of the entire record convinces us that there was no error in doing so.

Appellant’s first five points…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Rolfe v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Harris v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Dougherty v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Paradissis v. Royal Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API