Legal Opinion

George M. Dilley & Son v. Ratcliff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the County Court of Houston. Tried below before Hon. E. Winfree.

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by J. H. Ratcliff in the County Court of Houston County against Geo. M. Dilley & Son to recover damages for the breach of their contract of sale of certain cotton gin and sawmill machinery to the plaintiff. We are of the opinion that the evidence very clearly shows the breach of the contract both in respect to the pulley or fly wheel of the engine by which the cotton gin was to be put in operation and certain parts of the machinery necessary to the operation of the sawmill after the ginning season was over. The only questions that present any…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Chain Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. Secor v. SiverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Wolf v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. J. P. Smith Shoe Co. v. Curme-Feltman Shoe Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API