Legal Opinion

Cummings v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1987No. 87-234PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

Gordon Cummings, a Fayetteville lawyer, filed a suit for a declaratory judgment naming the City of Fayetteville as the interested party. The suit was to declare Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-718 (Repl. 1980), which governs the recall of city directors, unconstitutional as a violation of the police powers of the state and Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution. The attorney general was notified of the lawsuit pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-2510 (Repl. 1962), but declined to intervene. We affirm because we find no controversy; the appellant is simply asking for a legal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Andres v. First Ark. Development Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. McCutchen v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. McGuire v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API