Legal Opinion
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Hill
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 7, 1994No. 93-1240PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown,
Justice. This case concerns the validity of Amendment 73 to the Arkansas Constitution, which establishes limitations on the number of terms that can be served by state constitutional officers, and state legislators, and limitations on the eligibility of candidates for the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives to have their names placed on the election ballot. Amendment 73 was proposed as an initiated petition by the people of the State under Amendment 7 of the Arkansas Constitution and approved in the General Election on November 3, 1992, by a vote of 494,326 to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Donovan v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Ray v. MorthamSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.