Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. in Home Health, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1994No. C0-94-915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Following her termination by respondent In Home Health, Inc. (IHH), appellant Joyce Lloyd brought suit alleging: violation of Minn.Stat. § 181.932 (1992) (the “whistle-blower statute”), breach of contract, violation of Minn.Stat. § 181.13 (1992) (penalty for failure to pay wages promptly), defamation, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted summary judgment on all counts and Lloyd appeals only the defamation and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims. Because we find no material fact issues and because IHH is entitled to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Carlisle Ex Rel. Scott v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flynn v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Bebo v. DelanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Wallin v. Minnesota Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Bersch v. Rgnonti & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API