Legal Opinion
Brazil v. Division of Administration, State Department of Transportation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 21, 1977No. CC-66PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
B & B Advertising Company appeals a judgment granting the Florida Department of Transportation’s (hereafter referred to as DOT) application for mandatory injunction forcing removal of B & B’s outdoor sign and denying compensation for its removal. We find the appellant’s constitutional arguments without merit but reverse as to that portion of the judgment denying B & B compensation for removal of the sign.
In 1965, the United States Congress enacted the Highway Beautification Act as part of Title XXIII, United States Code. To further the national policy relating to control of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Florida Industrial Commission v. State Ex Rel. Orange State Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Corneal v. State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Freimuth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- LAMAR-ORLANDO, ETC. v. City of Ormond BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Tribune Co. v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- LaPointe Outdoor Advertising v. FLA. DEPT., ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.