Legal Opinion

Freimuth v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 20, 1972No. 41399PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

272 So.2d 473 (1972)

Leroy FREIMUTH, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41399.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 20, 1972.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joe Demember, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

ERVIN, Justice.

This is a certiorari review of Freimuth v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 249 So.2d 754.

Petitioner was charged by information on September 5, 1969 with unlawfully delivering a hallucinogenic drug[1] commonly known as STP contrary to F.S. Section 404.02(1), F.S.A.[2] At trial, the chemist who identified the drug stated that it was…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Boyd; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence · Boyd.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Florida Industrial Commission v. State Ex Rel. Orange State Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1945
  2. State v. HolmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Byrne Realty Co. v. South Florida Farms Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  5. Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bernie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Department of Legal Affairs v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. State v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API