Legal Opinion
Corneal v. State Plant Board
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 23, 1957PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 So.2d 1 (1957)
Harry CORNEAL and Gertrude Corneal, his wife, Appellants,
v.
STATE PLANT BOARD, a Body Corporate Under The Laws Of The State of Florida, and Charles Poucher, Individually and As Agent for Said Board, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B.
January 23, 1957.
Rehearing Denied March 27, 1957.
Allen E. Walker and Tom B. Walker, Winter Haven, for appellants.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Ralph E. Odum, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
ROBERTS, Justice.
This case has to do with the validity of a rule of the State Plant Board, appellee here, looking toward the control…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Bowman v. Virginia State EntomologistSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- County of Los Angeles v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Balch v. GlennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Campoamor v. State Live Stock Sanitary BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Plant Board v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- DEPT. OF AGRIC. AND CONSUMER SERV. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. BonannoSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Zabel v. Pinellas County Water & Nav. Con. Auth.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
- DEPT. OF AGR. AND CONSUMER SERVS. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.