Legal Opinion

Pierce Steel Pile Corp. v. Flannery

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1935No. Appeals, 167, 168, 169, 170 and 224PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

As we visualize the real situation brought to our attention by the defendant’s appeals in this case its boundaries are very narrow. Did the court properly vacate an award of arbitrators because it was not final and definite as to the matters submitted? Incidental to the court’s determination in this respect is the question whether the court properly confirmed the subsequent award.

At the outset of the discussion it is proper to observe that both parties were dissatisfied with the first award and both asked the court to modify it. The court, instead of modifying,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patriotic Order Sons of America Hall Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Pittsburgh Union Stock Yards Co. v. Pittsburgh Joint Stock Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Kingston Coal Co. v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Pierce Steel Pile Corporation v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mercury Oil Refining Co. v. Oil Workers International Union, CIO Oil Workers International Union, CIO v. Mercury Oil Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API