Legal Opinion
Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1930PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
The defendant in this arbitration proceeding, Goldberg, Maas & Co., Inc., signed and delivered to the plaintiff, Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc., an order for the purchase of twenty-five pieces of merchandise, described as style number 195, the price to be six dollars and ninety-five cents per yard, and delivery to be made at stated times. There was an arbitration clause as follows: “All claims, demands, disputes, differences, controversies and misunderstandings arising under, out of, or in connection with, or in relation to this contract, shall be submitted to and be determined…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- York v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Chicago Life Insurance v. CherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Jones v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. Chilean Nitrate and Iodine Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.