Legal Opinion
United States v. Hall
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 25, 1975No. Crim. 75-8PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Defendants Hall and Taylor have filed Motions for Discovery and Inspection. Defendant Hall in his Motion also moves for the Production of Evidence Favorable to the Accused. Both Motions are supported by Briefs. The Plaintiff has filed its Response to said Motions.
Defendant Hall seeks to discover the following matters: (1) Written or recorded statements, confessions, or admissions made by himself, any co-defendant, or any unin-dicted co-conspirator; (2) Physical objects obtained in investigating the case which may be used as evidence or which could be used by Defendant…
2Cases cited130 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Hinman v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Frank MotenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- United States v. Wilber N. Olander, William Dolman, Denne M. Harrington, Gary D. Rondeau, Gerald L. Minnich, Arthur Schruder, and Roy D. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.