Legal Opinion
Hinman v. Rogers
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1987No. Nos. 85-2753, 86-1031PublishedCited by 232 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the petitions for writ of mandamus and other documents filed in connection with these cases, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of these petitions. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.1.2. The causes are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
These matters come on for consideration of two petitions for writ of mandamus seeking the disqualification of the Honorable Richard D. Rogers, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, from further…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by232 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Green v. DorrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Terry Lynn Nichols v. Wayne E. Alley, District Judge, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Bryce v. Episcopal Church in the Diocese of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.