United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally Conforte
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in a tax evasion case. The appellants, Joseph and Sally Conforte, are the operators of an establishment called “Mustang Ranch,” described in the record as a legalized house of prostitution located in Nevada. The Confortes were convicted on four separate violations of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 for willful acts taken to evade or defeat federal employment taxes for the last quarter of 1974 and the first three quarters of 1975. The Government’s case was that the appellants willfully failed to file employment tax returns, to withhold…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by284 opinions
- Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.