Legal Opinion

Marano v. Gibbs

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1989No. 88-1309PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Two main issues are presented for our review. First, we must determine whether the court of appeals below was correct in reversing the trial court and holding that the lessees-users of the radio towers are public utilities. Second, we must consider whether former R.C. 519.21 exempts such land and structures from township zoning.

With respect to the first issue presented, all parties agree that the determination of entities as public utilities is a mixed question of law and fact. The definitions of a “public utility” set forth in R.C. 4905.02, 4905.03 and 5727.01 are not exclusive since those…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eastman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Industrial Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Southern Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Ohio Power Co. v. Village of AtticaOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Vernon v. Warner Amex Cable Communications, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. City of St. Marys v. Auglaize County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. White Current Corp. v. Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API