Legal Opinion

In re North Carolina National Bank

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1981No. 8022SC1076PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C-), Judge.

The sole question on this appeal is whether the court properly required petitioner to pay respondent’s counsel fees as a part *355of the costs of this proceeding. This is a special proceeding, commenced before the clerk of superior court pursuant to Article 5 of Chapter 35 of the General Statutes of North Carolina. See Patrick v. Trust Co., 216 N.C. 525, 5 S.E. 2d 724 (1939); 1 McIntosh, N.C. Practice and Procedure § 240, n. 21 (2d ed. 1956). Matters involving the estate of a ward are resolved by special proceedings before the clerk of superior court. See N.C. Gen. Stat.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. United Artists Records, Inc. v. Eastern Tape Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. In Re SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Baxter v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. In re StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. In re the Estate of SturmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API