Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1973No. 84PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The case after transfer was called for argument at an hour earlier than that previously fixed for the hearing in the Court of Appeals. Hence plaintiffs’ counsel,' through no fault of their own, were not present to participate in the argument, before this Court. In order that their rights may not be prejudiced by failure to participate in the oral argument, we have endeavored to conduct a most detailed review of their brief and of the record to the end that facts favorable to the petitioners may. not be overlooked.

The record indicates that Mrs. Pearl Boyd Baxter preferred that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. In Re the Will of CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Okwara v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Custom Molders, Inc. v. American Yard Products, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Redevelopment Commission of Hendersonville v. HyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. In re North Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API