In re the Estate of Sturman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
I
The first consideration for this Court is whether the procedure for the revocation of the letters testamentary of an administratrix *475as set forth in G.S. 28A-9-1 is an “action” or “special proceeding.” See G.S. 1A-1, Rule 17 (1983). If the revocation matter is an “action” or “special proceeding” under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 17(b), then the Clerk had statutory authority to appoint the guardian ad litem.
Rule 17 provides for the appointment of a guardian ad litem “in actions or special proceedings” where a party is either a plaintiff or a defendant. See G.S. 1A-1, Rule 17(b)(1) and (b)(2).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tate v. . MottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Phil Mechanic Const. Co., Inc. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re Will of HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- In re StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- In Re StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ParrishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In Re the Will of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- NEXSEN PRUET, PLLC v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011