Legal Opinion
Israel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 31, 1933No. 4982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
Mamie Israel was a manufacturer of tinware. In her place of business there was sold a copper boiler or still “intended,” as the government thought, for use in the unlawful manufacture of liquor. Under authority of sections 18 and 25, title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA §§ 30, 39), Federal Prohibition Agents, having obtained a search warrant, seized and took from her 73 copper boilers or stills and a large number of articles that looked like liquor-making' paraphernalia. From an order of the District Court discharging a rule upon the government to show cause…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nosowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Danovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Heitler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Feitler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Nobile v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Delaware Accessories Trade Ass'n v. GebeleinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Mid-Atlantic Accessories Trade Ass'n v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Record Revolution No. 6 v. City of Parma, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Franza v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Jacobs v. DancigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.