Legal Opinion
Record Revolution No. 6 v. City of Parma, Ohio
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 14, 1980No. C80-38PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
On January 10, 1980 the plaintiff, Record Revolution No. 6, Inc., filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the constitutionality of City of Parma Ordinance No. 242-79, an ordinance regulating the distribution, advertisement and use of “drug paraphernalia.” The plaintiff’s verified complaint seeks declaratory as well as injunctive relief. This court’s subject-matter jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(3), 2201, and 2202. On January 11, 1980 a hearing was held on the motion for a temporary restraining order filed by the…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Levas and Levas, D/B/A Levas T-Shirts v. Village of Antioch, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of ParmaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Florida Businessmen for Free Enterprise v. City of HollywoodCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Delaware Accessories Trade Ass'n v. GebeleinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.