Legal Opinion
Danovitz v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 5, 1930No. 424PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is a libel for the forfeiture of alleged contraband liquors, property and material designed for the manufacture of contraband liquors, specifically described, and alleged to have been unlawfully held in violation of Section 25, Title. II, of the National Prohibition Act. The District Court found that the allegations of fact contained in the libel were sustained and ordered a decree of forfeiture. The decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 34 F. (2d) 30. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court but confined to the single question whether the property seized is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Donnelley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- P. Lorrilard Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
3Cited by32 opinions
- William Stoianoff D/B/A the Joint Effort, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- United States v. BrunettDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1931
- United States v. TotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Record Revolution No. 6 v. City of Parma, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.