Legal Opinion
Feitler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 19, 1929No. 3996PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
On a libel for the forfeiture of goods and wares which, after search, the United States had seized because designed for the manufacture of liquor intended for use in violating the National Prohibition Act, the District Court decreed that the goods so seized and enumerated in the libel he forfeited to the United States and destroyed. The respondents appealed. The many errors they assign may be grouped and reduced to three.
The first is that the libel is bad as a pleading because it does not state facts which in themselves warrant or sustain the decree asked for. 33 Corpus…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Record Revolution No. 6 v. City of Parma, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Town of Clayton v. Colorado &. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Darby-Lynde Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. QUANTITY OF EXTRACTS, BOTTLES, ETC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1931
- Israel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.