Legal Opinion

People v. Dadmun

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1913No. Crim. No. 310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, George Beebe, Deputy Attorney-General, and H. S. Utley, District Attorney, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

An indictment presented by the grand jury against defendant charged him with grand larceny in that it is alleged that he “did willfully, unlawfully and feloniously steal and carry away a certain” grant deed signed and acknowledged by one George W. Webb, wherein defendant was named as grantee, which deed, if properly delivered, was sufficient in form and substance to convey to defendant the title of Webb to the property described therein, alleged to be of the value of ten thousand dollars, which “grant deed and the said property therein described and the title to which was thereby shown and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Warnock v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Callan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. CaridisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Stubbs v. AbercrombieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. People v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API