Legal Opinion

People v. Norwood

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1972No. Crim. 20825PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AISO, J.

Defendant Paul A. Norwood and Willie Curtis Andrews 1 were charged by information with four separate violations of Penal Code section 475a. Counts I and H specified the instrument involved in each of those counts as “a completed warrant.” The specific pleading of counts ITT and IV alleged, in part, possession of “a completed money order . . . with the intent to defraud Frank Gentile and American Express.” A prior robbery conviction was also alleged against defendant.

A court sitting without a jury granted defendant’s motion to acquit pursuant to Penal Code section 1118 as to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Silber v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API