People v. Norwood
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AISO, J.
Defendant Paul A. Norwood and Willie Curtis Andrews 1 were charged by information with four separate violations of Penal Code section 475a. Counts I and H specified the instrument involved in each of those counts as “a completed warrant.” The specific pleading of counts ITT and IV alleged, in part, possession of “a completed money order . . . with the intent to defraud Frank Gentile and American Express.” A prior robbery conviction was also alleged against defendant.
A court sitting without a jury granted defendant’s motion to acquit pursuant to Penal Code section 1118 as to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Silber v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.