Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Caridis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1915No. Crim. No. 578PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco allowing a demurrer to the information. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Frank L. Guerena, and John H. Riordan, Deputies Attorney-General, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The defendant in this case was, by an information filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, charged with the crime of grand larceny, alleged to have been committed as follows:

“The said Antonio Caridis on the 29th day of July, A. D. 1914, at the said City and County of San Francisco, State of California, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously steal, take and carry away one lottery ticket of the Original Nacional Company, No. 16235, that theretofore and on the 27th day of July, 1914, the said ticket was, after a drawing held by said Original Nacional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Crutchfield v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. State v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. People v. DadmunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. CuellarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API