Stubbs v. Abercrombie
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendants the sum of fifty thousand dollars for damages alleged to have been sustained by him by reason of false imprisonment.
The material allegations of the amended complaint, so far as the gist of the present action is concerned, were denied. Demurrers interposed by defendants were overruled by the eoui’t. When the ease came on for trial the defendant Lyons, the constable, and Palmer, the justice of the peace, moved to strike the amended complaint from the files, so far as they were concerned. This motion was denied. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Rush v. BuckleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gifford v. WigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Gogue v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Wilson v. LaphamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Barrier v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Malone v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.