Legal Opinion
Engers v. AT & T
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 31, 2006No. Civ.A.98-3660(JLL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION 1
LINARES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motions for partial summary judgment 2 of Plaintiffs Phillip C. Engers, Warren J. McFall, Donald G. Noerr & Gerald Smit (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants AT & T and the AT & T Management Pension Plan (collectively “Defendants”). The Court has considered all submissions in support and in opposition to these motions. No oral argument was heard. Fed. R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons stated herein, the motion of Plaintiffs is denied and the motion of Defendants is denied in part and granted in part.
BACKGROUND
A. Procedural…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & AgentsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Citigroup Pension Plan ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- COLEGROVE v. WETZELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- R. Stockton v. PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.